Mining Matters

With the ongoing lapse in federal funding, much of the federal government is not working. This has a direct impact on MSHA (Mine Safety and Health Administration). While inspection and investigation activity continues, other functions at MSHA are not operating. So, what are mine operators to do? In this episode, Arthur and Chris review what the federal shutdown means for operators, what ongoing responsibilities remain, and how mine safety personnel can best proceed during this unusual time.

Mine operators are familiar with the process of inspectors visiting the mine to ensure that a cited condition has been abated. But what if operators could demonstrate abatement by sending information to MSHA (Mine Safety and Health Administration) instead of having inspectors return? This process is typical in the OSHA context and was recently raised as a possibility for MSHA. In this episode, Arthur and Chris explore this possibility for MSHA, what challenges it might pose and what questions would need to be answered if it is rolled out.

It is often said that the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act is a “strict liability” law. As a legal term, “strict liability” means “liability without fault.” But what does that mean? In this episode, Arthur and Chris explain this foundational concept of the Mine Act and then offer real world examples to explain what it looks like. They also explain that, while strict liability poses a challenge to operators who may disagree with enforcement actions, there are caveats to it that may provide relief in certain circumstances.

What challenges are operators facing with MSHA (Mine Safety and Health Administration) in 2025? What can they do about it? In this episode, Chris and Arthur tackle these questions and more with mine safety consultants DJ Schmutz and Kim Redding from MSHA Safety Services Inc. The group discusses challenges posed by inexperienced inspectors, how operators can best position themselves, and what they hope to see from MSHA going forward in a lively discussion.

The Department of Labor recently issued a memorandum announcing the relaunch of the opinion letter program. The memorandum announced that several agencies within the DOL, including OSHA, will offer the public the opportunity to obtain opinion letters to address particular questions regarding compliance. While MSHA is included in the memorandum, it will not be offering opinion letters in this way. Instead, MSHA is offering an “Information Hub,” which is essentially a reconfiguring of information that it already provides. In this episode, Arthur and Chris explain the DOL opinion letter program and call on MSHA to also offer this option to the regulated community in the same manner that OSHA does for general industry.

May is Mental Health Awareness Month and although this episode is publishing in June, there’s never a wrong time to talk about mental health in the workplace. In this episode, Arthur and Chris welcome back Raeann Burgo, attorney in Fisher Phillips’ Pittsburgh office, to discuss the latest in mental health and what it means for employers. Raeann provides an update on trends and issues she’s seeing in this area and the group also discusses a hypothetical situation that an employer may face. We conclude by offering resources and best practices for our listeners to take back to their workplaces.

Employers are faced with unexpected challenges every day. Frequently, the ability to conduct a timely and effective internal investigation will be the difference in managing and responding to situations as they arise. This month, Arthur and Chris welcome Erin Gibson Allen, an attorney and member of Fisher Phillips Workplace Investigations Practice Group to discuss the importance of workplace investigations, how to prepare for them before an incident occurs and how best to execute them when the need arises. The wide-ranging discussion includes specific points for safety and health and offers tips based on experience in the field.

Among the unique features of the Mine Act is the authority for MSHA to pursue both civil and criminal liability against individuals in their capacity as managers. But to get to that point, MSHA will engage in an in-depth investigation triggered by an elevated enforcement action against the company. In this episode, Arthur and Chris review Section 110 of the Mine Act, which authorizes personal liability, and how application of that law looks in the real world. They offer practical pointers for preparing for a 110 investigation, managing the investigation once it begins, and how to handle to possible outcomes that may result.

In a time of uncertainty within the federal government, mine operators can continue to expect regular MSHA inspections. MSHA is statutorily required to inspect all surface mines twice per year and all underground mines four times per year. That won’t change despite other major changes that may occur within federal agencies. With that in mind, this month’s episode of Mining Matters goes back to basics and discusses how mine operators can best position themselves for successful MSHA inspections. Arthur and Chris offer an explanation of key legal concepts that come into play during inspections and practical pointers that come from years of experience.

The new year has brought with it a new administration and changes are on the horizon for all federal agencies, including MSHA. But what can mine operators reasonably expect from the new regime? In this episode, Chris and Arthur offer their thoughts on what may and may not change from MSHA in the new administration. They also offer tips on what to look for in 2025 as new leadership at the agency takes shape.